Prepare for the Law and Ethics Exam. Study with comprehensive multiple choice questions and detailed explanations. Get ready to excel in your examination!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What is the legal requirement when a 13-year-old client discloses sexual abuse by a camp counselor?

  1. Assure him that his parents will understand and need to be told

  2. File a report with Nevada Child Protective Services

  3. File a report with California Child Protective Services

  4. Obtain a release to contact the camp and inform them of allegations

The correct answer is: File a report with California Child Protective Services

In this scenario, the correct action involves understanding the legal obligations related to child abuse reporting. When a minor, such as a 13-year-old, discloses abuse, the professional must adhere to mandated reporting laws, which vary by state. The requirement to report abuse is typically based on where the abuse occurred or where the client resides. In this case, if the camp is located in Nevada and the incident occurred there, Child Protective Services in Nevada would be the appropriate agency to contact. Reporting to the agency that covers the state where the abuse took place ensures compliance with state laws designed to protect children. Making a report is a critical step in the legal process to ensure the child's safety and may lead to further investigations regarding the camp counselor’s actions. Failure to report can have legal repercussions for the professional who learned of the abuse. In contrast, simply assuring the child that parents will understand does not fulfill the legal requirement to notify authorities. Obtaining a release for contacting the camp would not be appropriate, as such actions may further jeopardize the child's safety or hinder investigations. Lastly, reporting to the wrong jurisdiction, such as California services if the incident occurred in Nevada, would not satisfy legal obligations, possibly allowing for further risk to the child. In summary